We performed a comparison between Accedian Skylight and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Accedian Skylight is highly appreciated for its intuitive interface, advanced analytics capabilities, and exceptional performance. Datadog stands out for its advantageous offerings like customizable dashboards, and extensive integration options. Accedian Skylight has potential for enhancement by including a localized cloud option in Vietnam, improving reporting capabilities, facilitating solution updates without requiring repurchases, offering competitive pricing for NetFlow connection, and enhancing the user interface. Datadog can improve usability, integration, monitoring of external websites, security features, customization flexibility, documentation, and ease of implementation.
Service and Support: Accedian Skylight's customer service is highly regarded for its quick and knowledgeable assistance. Datadog's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback, with some users appreciating their promptness and accessibility, while others have faced delays and unresolved problems.
Ease of Deployment: Accedian Skylight's initial setup can range from simple and well-documented to challenging for network novices. Datadog's setup is generally seen as easy, but some users found it slightly complex and involved multiple teams for adjustments.
ROI: Accedian Skylight has consistently demonstrated a favorable return on investment for more than a decade. Users have reported different experiences with Datadog's ROI. Some users appreciate the time-saving and reduced blindspots it offers, while others value its ability to quickly debug live sites and save on labor.
Pricing: Users have differing opinions on the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it costly and others finding it reasonable in comparison to other options. Nonetheless, the pricing structure is perplexing and lacks proper documentation. On the other hand, Accedian Skylight's pricing is generally competitive, but since being acquired, the prices have risen significantly, posing difficulties in selling the product.
Comparison Results: Accedian Skylight is the preferred choice over Datadog. Users praise Accedian Skylight for its user-friendly interface, superior performance, helpful support, and detailed documentation for easy implementation.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Capturing traffic [is very interesting]. Currently, with our configuration, we don't capture the payload of the packets, just the header. But when we want the body, the payload of the packets, we can do a PCAP, and then analyze it within Wireshark."
"The response times, with the performance, are really interesting too, where you can see the packet loss."
"If [the problem] is something related to HTTP or VoIP, then I can have a quick look into the protocols, a process which gives me some good ideas..."
"What I like most about Accedian Skylight is that it's a UI application, so using it is easy. I also like that the support for Accedian Skylight is helpful."
"The feature I used to like the most was its ability to decode layer seven protocols, although this is becoming less useful now that encryption is so widespread."
"This solution has helped to improve the interaction between our network, datacenter, and application teams. I have used other tools, but this tool can pinpoint the root cause of my application or network issue in the majority of the cases. So, it helps different divisions or groups in the IT department to troubleshoot together and get an issue resolved. This tool helps a lot in our day-to-day networking application and IT operations."
"The performance of Accedian Skylight is better than other vendors."
"I always have the Skylight dashboard on one of my screens... Now you can create your own dashboard, specific to an application, specific to a server, or to something else."
"The RUM solution has improved our ability to triage faster and hand more capabilities to our customer support."
"It has saved us a lot of trouble in implementation."
"It brings in observability, monitoring, and alerting capabilities - all of which we need to operate at scale."
"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."
"It has empowered all our platform engineers with a very powerful and easy to use monitoring system."
"The feature I have found most valuable is when I can reuse existing monitors and alerts for new dashboards."
"The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents."
"The many dozens of integrations that the solution brings out of the box are excellent."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"It needs the possibility to export data because it is not easy to see larger data sets, e.g., for one month. It would be interesting to export data into a PDF or dashboard to keep a history of the situation."
"Some of the Skylight applications are a little newer, and they're still moving through initial revs. There are certain bugs, but nothing is insurmountable... It will just take a little bit of time for their user interface to get a little bit better."
"The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."
"This solution is expensive compared to some others."
"If you want a new version, you go to the website. The hardest part is finding the link, where is that .bin file? Sometimes it's pretty hidden in a document... it's hidden in the release notes or in another file somewhere. And it's usually not on the first page either."
"It's a bit slow. When I execute a query, something general with a short timeframe that covers one month, for instance, and I do not specify the IP source or IP destination, it can take ages because it has to query the whole database."
"I would like to see some improvements in parts of their synthetic transactions, which includes all the latency, jitter, and throughput. I would like to see some Layer 7 analytics in there. I want to be able to do a DNS request, HTTP GET request, or even SIP call point-to-point or via registration."
"Because of the policies in Vietnam, we cannot connect the system to the Accedian cloud. It would be good if Accedian could provide a local cloud. In the next release, I would like them to focus on improving and adding more reporting features. This will help the operations teams."
"I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock."
"Once Datadog has gained wide adoption, it can often be overwhelming to both know and understand where to go to find answers to questions."
"The pricing should be less of a surprise."
"The on-premise version is very difficult to upgrade."
"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."
"Datadog is expensive."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"This service could be less costly."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Accedian Skylight is ranked 37th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 23 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Accedian Skylight is rated 9.0, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Accedian Skylight writes "Highly scalable, responsive support, but lacking new features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Accedian Skylight is most compared with ThousandEyes, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, SolarWinds NPM, Dynatrace and Niagara Visibility Controller, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability. See our Accedian Skylight vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.