We performed a comparison between Actifio and Azure Backup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Actifio was very stable. Whenever they identified bugs, they would promptly provide us with patches."
"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."
"They will assist me in achieving whatever budget issue the client may be having."
"This product has unique capabilities that lead the product category in test data management, cloning and recovery."
"The solution helps reduce costs."
"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."
"The scalability has been good."
"The best aspect of the solution is its backup functionality."
"It is easy to schedule backups."
"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"The storage backup is very efficient."
"The product is very reliable and easy to use."
"Setting up Azure Backup is straightforward and the total deployment time was about a month."
"Lacks the option to price backup costs within the solution itself."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version of the tool."
"While the product does support various databases, the company needs to make more of an effort to support N-minus-one compatibility."
"The solution doesn't support AIX software or in-cloud, and we have a lot of servers running on AIX and Oracle."
"Areas that need improvement would be the support for recovery in the physical environment."
"The extensibility onto hybrid environments needs a bit of tweaking for those on-prem."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."
"Ransomware protection is missing in Azure Backup."
"It can be further improved by continuously meeting its compliance requirements."
"Azure Backup must include features similar to enterprise solutions."
"I would like to see more automation, integration, and security. The price could be better."
"Azure lacks sufficient solutions for a particular scenario, we may need to resort to using third-party applications. In such cases, these applications can be employed to facilitate backup, replication, and the efficient utilization of internet connectivity and bandwidth. They enable us to effectively manage and transfer data while ensuring optimal utilization of network resources. However, it would be a benefit if we did not have to use third-party applications for these operations."
Actifio is ranked 23rd in Backup and Recovery with 8 reviews while Azure Backup is ranked 9th in Backup and Recovery with 51 reviews. Actifio is rated 8.8, while Azure Backup is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Actifio writes "Actifio enables quick and efficient data refreshes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". Actifio is most compared with Rubrik, Delphix, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud and NetApp Cloud Backup, whereas Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup. See our Actifio vs. Azure Backup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.