We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"Provides good dashboard visualization."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a stable, reliable product."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"It has good stability."
"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated."
"We need different kinds of applications in our infrastructure to see information in Grafana."
"The look and feel of the charting and graph capabilities in Grafana could improve. If they provided a storyboard type of feature as they have in other solutions, such as PowerBI. The multi-tenanted and stitch metrics features could improve."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
"Its interface could be more accessible."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"The solution must provide tutorials and guides."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.