We compared AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Users praised AWS Fargate for its seamless scalability, ease of use, and efficient resource management. Conversely, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling received positive feedback for its ability to dynamically adjust resources based on demand and its scalability. Fargate was valued for abstracting away infrastructure, while EC2 Auto Scaling was appreciated for its optimal performance and cost efficiency. The reliability, efficiency, and helpfulness of customer service were highlighted for both products. Suggestions for improvement included enhancing container orchestration capabilities for Fargate and improving instance type selection and customization for EC2 Auto Scaling.
Features: AWS Fargate's valuable features include seamless scalability, ease of use, efficient resource management, abstraction of underlying infrastructure, no server maintenance, high security and flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling focuses on dynamic resource adjustments based on demand, optimal performance and cost efficiency, scalability, flexibility, seamless integration with other AWS services, and easy setup and configuration.
Pricing and ROI: Users have praised AWS Fargate for its affordability and flexibility in pricing plans, ease of setup, and straightforward licensing process. On the other hand, users have found Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling's pricing reasonable and competitive, with a low setup cost. Licensing is also considered user-friendly, ensuring a smooth experience., Based on user feedback, AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling both offer positive ROI. Fargate excels in efficiency, scalability, and time-saving, while Auto Scaling impresses with increased cost-effectiveness and resource allocation flexibility.
Room for Improvement: AWS Fargate could improve container orchestration capabilities, visibility and monitoring tools, resource allocation and scaling, networking limitations, and customer support. On the other hand, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling could enhance instance selection, documentation, user interface, integration, error reporting, and resource control.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews indicate that the deployment, setup, or implementation duration for AWS Fargate can vary significantly, with some users reporting spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, for Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, one user mentioned a three-month deployment and a one-week setup, while another user completed both in just one week. These reviews suggest that AWS Fargate may have a longer and more variable duration for deployment and setup compared to Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling., AWS Fargate's customer service has been positively reviewed, with users highlighting the promptness, efficiency, knowledge, and expertise of the support team. Similarly, users of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling have praised the fast, reliable, and helpful assistance provided by the support team.
The summary above is based on 36 interviews we conducted recently with AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The auto-scaling feature is particularly useful. Additionally, CloudWatch and CloudTrail are also important features for us."
"Can handle traffic spikes so the system doesn't overload."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the seamless resizing of web connection."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is scaling your intra based on the request. Additionally, you are able to map the solution with any load balancer, such as public or private load balancers."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"We appreciate that this solution allows us to run all of our severs through it, meaning that our workloads are mainly on the EC2 instance only."
"Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling has good integration."
"I like the fact that you don't need to pay for it when you aren't using it, especially in a disaster recovery scenario. The pricing is transparent, so you know what you're going to pay for it."
"Fargate itself is a stable product. We are quite satisfied with its performance."
"If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."
"I like their containerization service. You can use Docker or something similar and deploy quickly without the know-how related to, for example, Kubernetes. If you use AKS or Kubernetes, then you have to have the know-how. But for Fargate, you don't need to have the know-how there. You just deploy the container or the image, and then you have the container, and you can use it as AWS takes care of the rest. This makes it easier for those getting started or if you don't have a strong DevOps team inside your organization."
"AWS Fargate has many valuable services. It does the job with minimal trouble. It's very observable. You can see what's going on and you have logs. You have everything. You can troubleshoot it. It's affordable and it's flexible."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ease of use."
"AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."
"The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling process."
"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."
"The primary area for improvement is the pricing model."
"Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling could improve by adding better integration features with the other services. Additionally, if the alarms could be triggered from other services this would be beneficial."
"There is room for improvement. You might end up paying a high price if you're not careful and you provision a server that's underutilized."
"The solution could improve by having more automation. Nowadays there is a vast variety of automation. Additionally, infrastructure monitoring could improve."
"The pricing could be reduced."
"There should be an AWS instance in South Africa, where the latency would be even lower. It might happen soon since AWS has recently opened more data centres in Nigeria. AWS may extend its reach to South Africa, and offer hosted CLI servers there. Most of the problems with AWS are not to do with the solution itself but with configuration. It is something on design, more or less."
"Automation is very hard."
"The solution's configuration process could be better."
"If there are any options to manage containers, that would be good. That relates more to the cost point. For example, over the next three months, I'll be making a comparison between solutions like CAST AI and other software-as-a-service platforms that offer Kubernetes management with an emphasis on cost reduction."
"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."
"The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers."
"We would like to see some improvement in the process documents that are provided with this product, particularly for auto-scaling and other configuration tools that are a bit complicated."
"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."
"I would like to see the older dashboard instead of the newer version. I don't like the new dashboard."
"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is ranked 2nd in Compute Service with 39 reviews while AWS Fargate is ranked 6th in Compute Service with 8 reviews. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while AWS Fargate is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling writes "Well-documented setup process and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Fargate writes "Offers serverless capabilities, self-managed, simplifies ease of use and integrates with other AWS services". Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is most compared with AWS Lambda, AWS Batch, Oracle Compute Cloud Service and Amazon Elastic Inference, whereas AWS Fargate is most compared with Amazon EC2, AWS Lambda, AWS Batch, Oracle Compute Cloud Service and Apache Spark. See our AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling report.
See our list of best Compute Service vendors.
We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
