Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,002 views|7,309 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
10,950 views|5,021 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 14, 2022

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS and SQL Azure based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions relate that setup and deployment are easy and straightforward.
  • Features: Amazon RDS users like that the solution is easy to use and very stable, flexible, and robust. Users are able to select as many tools, replicas, regions, and zones as desired. Users tell us the Performance Monitor can be a bit clunky and an improved GUI would be welcomed. They would like better integration with Microsoft products and feel that many of the security features could be improved.

    SQL Azure users like that the product integrates seamlessly with SQL Server on-premises, in addition to the darknet stack and table groups. The solution offers a very intuitive interface and easy to manage firewall settings. There are many functions available on-premises that are not currently available with Azure cloud.
  • Pricing: Users of both of these products feel that pricing is very high and that overall costs could be lower.
  • Service and Support: Users of both solutions are very satisfied with the service and support they have received.

Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, SQL Azure nudges slightly ahead of Amazon RDS. SQL Azure is part of the Microsoft Azure ecosystem and offers huge benefits to Microsoft / Microsoft Azure, users which represents tremendous cost savings, great security, and seamless integrations with most Microsoft products.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure Report (Updated: May 2024).
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to set up initially.""Amazon RDS is lightweight and flexible.""I use Amazon RDS to store and manage data securely. It helps me retrieve information and gain insights from the data that comes in for my business or specific applications.""Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy.""The most valuable aspect of Amazon RDS is it is on the cloud.""It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy.""For me, RDS is a great solution. I like that Amazon RDS is a very simple solution to implement and to start using.""Amazon RDS is a scalable solution."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"The stability is good.""Cost savings are the most valuable. The DR/high availability is also valuable. The failover group with the built-in DR/high availability features is probably one of the easiest things.""The most valuable feature is PolyBase.""The hardware is all managed by Microsoft.""We're a Microsoft customer, so it fits in with everything else we work with.""Its technical support team is good.""The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment takes about one hour.""It's easy to use in terms of their portal, which is very nicely organized."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"I feel Amazon RDS should have a lot of functionalities to make monitoring within the database easier.""A lot of the features are disabled by default. The solution should enable more features. I understand this could cause challenges to management for many clients using RDS, however.""I would like to see improvements in the tool's automatic restart.""It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service.""If we do not keep track of our costs, we might face some problems.""The solution's version upgrade and performance could be improved.""The product should support new databases.""There are a few aspects of database management that have room for improvement. There are a few parameters in the solution that are a bit unclear at our end as it's not understandable."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"If the product could support applications requiring an SQL server for installation, by using SQL Azure as a backend, that would be useful.""It would help if the solution was more secure.""It's very difficult to investigate if something wrong is going on behind the scenes. If we are facing a problem that our application is doing a CPU spike and when we look at the dump of the details, the processes that our application is generating are not consuming more than 40-50% of CPU. But we don’t know where it is going, who's generating it, and who's consuming the CPU. Even Microsoft says they don’t know.""I want the pricing to be improved.""The solution’s visibility could be improved.""The solution needs to improve its customer network, including its online support.""The solution can be improved by reducing the constraints available.""I think that the cost management in SQL is not clear because we may use some tax to identify products, but in some cases identifying the transactions in SQL is not easy for some financial cost centers."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,002
    Comparisons
    7,309
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    2nd
    Views
    10,950
    Comparisons
    5,021
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization62%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise65%
    Large Enterprise24%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon RDS is ranked 1st in Database as a Service with 45 reviews while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. Amazon RDS is rated 8.4, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon RDS writes "Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". Amazon RDS is most compared with MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and IBM Db2 on Cloud. See our Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.