We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The solution is secure."
"I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower."
"We like that the price is cheaper."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."
"I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings."
"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
"The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."
"The tool is simple to use and not very expensive."
"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."
"The stability must be improved."
"The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage."
"They can improve data discovery."
"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."
"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."
"A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems."
"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."
"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."
"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS writes "Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is most compared with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.