Anaconda vs Databricks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Anaconda Logo
2,704 views|2,040 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Databricks Logo
28,492 views|18,008 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anaconda and Databricks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Science Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Anaconda vs. Databricks Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The notebook feature is an improvement over RStudio.""The virtual environment is very good.""The most advantageous feature is the logic building.""The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.""Voice Configuration and Environmental Management Capabilities are the most valuable features.""The most valuable feature is the Jupyter notebook that allows us to write the Python code, compile it on the fly, and then look at the results.""The most valuable feature is the set of libraries that are used to support the functionality that we require.""With Anaconda Navigator, we have been able to use multiple IDEs such as JupyterLab, Jupyter Notebook, Spyder, Visual Studio Code, and RStudio in one place. The platform-agnostic package manager, "Conda", makes life easy when it comes to managing and installing packages."

More Anaconda Pros →

"It can send out large data amounts.""The most valuable feature of Databricks is the notebook, data factory, and ease of use.""The most valuable feature is the Spark cluster which is very fast for heavy loads, big data processing and Pi Spark.""Databricks is based on a Spark cluster and it is fast. Performance-wise, it is great.""Imageflow is a visual tool that helps make it easier for business people to understand complex workflows.""There are good features for turning off clusters.""The technical support is good.""The solution is very simple and stable."

More Databricks Pros →

Cons
"Anaconda could benefit from improvement in its user interface to make it more attractive and user-friendly. Currently, it's boring.""It also takes up a lot of space.""I think better documentation or a step-by-step guide for installation would help, especially for on-premise users.""The interface could be improved. Other solutions, like Visual Studio, have much better UI.""I think that the framework can be improved to make it easier for people to discover and use things on their own.""Anaconda should be optimized for RAM consumption.""When you install Anaconda for the first time, it's really difficult to update it.""The solution would benefit from offering more automation."

More Anaconda Cons →

"It would be great if Databricks could integrate all the cloud platforms.""The Databricks cluster can be improved.""The initial setup is difficult.""There would also be benefits if more options were available for workers, or the clusters of the two points.""The product should incorporate more learning aspects. It needs to have a free trial version that the team can practice.""Can be improved by including drag-and-drop features.""If I want to create a Databricks account, I need to have a prior cloud account such as an AWS account or an Azure account. Only then can I create a Databricks account on the cloud. However, if they can make it so that I can still try Databricks even if I don't have a cloud account on AWS and Azure, it would be great. That is, it would be nice if it were possible to create a pseudo account and be provided with a free trial. It is very essential to creating a workforce on Databricks. For example, students or corporate staff can then explore and learn Databricks.""Anyone who doesn't know SQL may find the product difficult to work with."

More Databricks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing costs for Anaconda are reasonable."
  • "The product is open-source and free to use."
  • "My company uses the free version of the tool. There is also a paid version of the tool available."
  • "The tool is open-source."
  • "Anaconda is free to use, but in terms of hardware costs, you might need heavy GPUs to run CUDA and other demanding tasks."
  • More Anaconda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Whenever we want to find the actual costing, we have to send an email to Databricks, so having the information available on the internet would be helpful."
  • "I do not exactly know the costs, but one of our clients pays between $100 USD and $200 USD monthly."
  • "Licensing on site I would counsel against, as on-site hardware issues tend to really delay and slow down delivery."
  • "We find Databricks to be very expensive, although this improved when we found out how to shut it down at night."
  • "The pricing depends on the usage itself."
  • "I am based in South Africa, where it is expensive adapting to the cloud, and then there is the price for the tool itself."
  • "The price is okay. It's competitive."
  • "Databricks uses a price-per-use model, where you can use as much compute as you need."
  • More Databricks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
    Top Answer:Anaconda could benefit from improvement in its user interface to make it more attractive and user-friendly. Currently, it's boring.
    Top Answer:Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with… more »
    Top Answer:We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It… more »
    Top Answer:Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    Views
    2,704
    Comparisons
    2,040
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    457
    Rating
    8.0
    1st
    Views
    28,492
    Comparisons
    18,008
    Reviews
    47
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash
    Learn More
    Overview

    Anaconda makes it easy for you to install and maintain Python environments. Our development team tests to ensure compatibility of Python packages in Anaconda. We support and provide open source assurance for packages in Anaconda to mitigate your risk in using open source and meet your regulatory compliance requirements.

    Python is the fastest growing language for data science. Anaconda includes 720+ Python open source packages and now includes essential R packages. This powerful combination allows you to do everything you want from BI to advanced modeling on complex Big Data

    Databricks is an industry-leading data analytics platform which is a one-stop product for all data requirements. Databricks is made by the creators of Apache Spark, Delta Lake, ML Flow, and Koalas. It builds on these technologies to deliver a true lakehouse data architecture, making it a robust platform that is reliable, scalable, and fast. Databricks speeds up innovations by synthesizing storage, engineering, business operations, security, and data science.

    Databricks is integrated with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud Platform. This enables users to easily manage a colossal amount of data and to continuously train and deploy machine learning models for AI applications. The platform handles all analytic deployments, ranging from ETL to models training and deployment.

    Databricks deciphers the complexities of processing data to empower data scientists, engineers, and analysts with a simple collaborative environment to run interactive and scheduled data analysis workloads. The program takes advantage of AI’s cost-effectivity, flexibility, and cloud storage.

    Databricks Key Features

    Some of Databricks key features include:

    • Cloud-native: Works well on any prominent cloud provider.
    • Data storage: Stores a broad range of data, including structured, unstructured, and streaming.
    • Self-governance: Built-in governance and security controls.
    • Flexibility: Flexible for small-scale jobs as well as running large-scale jobs like Big Data processing because it’s built from Spark and is specifically optimized for Cloud environments.
    • Data science tools: Production-ready data tooling, from engineering to BI, AI, and ML.
    • Familiar languages: While Databricks is Spark-based, it allows commonly used programming languages like R, SQL, Scala, and Python to be used.
    • Team sharing workspaces: Creates an environment that provides interactive workspaces for collaboration, which allow multiple members to collaborate for data model creation, machine learning, and data extraction.
    • Data source: Performs limitless Big Data analytics by connecting to Cloud providers AWS, Azure, and Google, as well as on-premises SQL servers, JSON and CSV.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Databricks stands out from its competitors for several reasons. Two striking features are its collaborative ability and its ability to streamline multiple programming languages.

    PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features. A Chief Research Officer in consumer goods writes, “We work with multiple people on notebooks and it enables us to work collaboratively in an easy way without having to worry about the infrastructure. I think the solution is very intuitive, very easy to use. And that's what you pay for.”

    A business intelligence coordinator in construction notes, “The capacity of use of the different types of coding is valuable. Databricks also has good performance because it is running in spark extra storage, meaning the performance and the capacity use different kinds of codes.”

    An Associate Manager who works in consultancy mentions, “The technology that allows us to write scripts within the solution is extremely beneficial. If I was, for example, able to script in SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python, I would be able to use my knowledge to make a script in this solution. It is very user-friendly and you can also process the records and validation point of view. The ability to migrate from one environment to another is useful.”

    Sample Customers
    LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
    Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Non Tech Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Retailer9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Anaconda vs. Databricks
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaconda vs. Databricks and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Anaconda is ranked 13th in Data Science Platforms with 17 reviews while Databricks is ranked 1st in Data Science Platforms with 78 reviews. Anaconda is rated 8.0, while Databricks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anaconda writes "Offers free version and is helpful to handle small-scale workloads". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Databricks writes "A nice interface with good features for turning off clusters to save on computing". Anaconda is most compared with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Amazon SageMaker, Microsoft Power BI, IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio, whereas Databricks is most compared with Amazon SageMaker, Informatica PowerCenter, Dataiku, Dremio and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. See our Anaconda vs. Databricks report.

    See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.