We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Eggplant Performance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are using this for performance testing and some automation."
"Due to process automation, I don't have to prepare reports, making it the perfect solution."
"The reports and analysis tools are very good. They are the solution's most valuable features."
"The solution has good transition controllers and distributed testing."
"It is an open-source tool that is easy to use. It can be easily integrated with multiple tools, including Selenium."
"Apache JMeter is quite flexible."
"I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing."
"The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool."
"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"Apache should have a graphic interface."
"At times when we overload the application, it gets stuck...After the solution gets stuck due to overloading, we have to restart our computers. In short, the solution keeps crashing."
"We would like more documentation to be provided for the advanced level features that are available in this solution, in order to improve development."
"In terms of setup, it could be nicer, to be honest. Sometimes, I get a little bit lost."
"The installation needs some work. It could be simplified."
"Apache JMeter's UI can be made more colorful."
"We're like the solution to be more user-friendly."
"It will be much easier, and beneficial for the individual to run it on their own machines rather than having a high-end infrastructure, more CPUs, or more memory that has been consumed by Apache JMeter."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Katalon Studio, whereas Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis NeoLoad. See our Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.