We performed a comparison between Apigee and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility allows you to quickly run a cloud-native application architecture."
"We use it to build API proxies for securing targeted back-ends with an emphasis on Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD)."
"The pricing is okay."
"Apigee Analytics dashboard is useful to monitor transactions, error percentage, transaction latency, etc."
"The initial setup was easy - there was an onboarding document with steps that we followed."
"The usability is one of the best aspects of the product."
"Apigee provides out-of-the-box policies, so it is ready to use with minimal configuration to those policies. You can govern your API and manage the life cycle of the API completely with the Apigee tool."
"The capabilities are very powerful."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"The performance is good."
"Could be more user friendly."
"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."
"When it comes to the rate limit, we don't have a specific category for rate limits for a particular customer."
"The pricing for the product was a bit higher. I also found it challenging to manage sometimes."
"I would like to see SOAP services and socket-based connectivity developed."
"I would like to see better integration and some architectural improvements in future releases of the solution."
"Apigee is demanding on the infrastructure so the setup cost is very high for an on-premises deployment."
"When there is an update on a new version or an automatic update, you have to be present and double-check that the update is reflected in the environment with no issues."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager, Amazon API Gateway and Layer7 API Management, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Apigee vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.