We performed a comparison between Appian and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is really simple to create a new app, and I like the data-centric aspect of the BPM tool."
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features."
"It provides us with real-time data on all connected systems in terms of how they're integrated with each other and how they are performing in a workflow manner."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"The setup is easy."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"Native mobile capabilities or hybrid mobile app capabilities are very limited. Things like offline sync, offline storage, access to smartphone device features, etc. are not supported by the Appian platform yet."
"I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Appian vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.