We performed a comparison between Appian and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"Rapid development with low-code makes it easier to quickly get apps implemented and the time to break-even and ROI is much faster."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"What I found most valuable in Appian is that it lets you drill down on multiple things through the structure of the reporting and UI side. It's also low-code, yet it results in quick deliverables."
"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"Appian could include other applications that we could reuse for other customers, CRM for example."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda and webMethods Integration Server. See our Appian vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.