We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Radware DefenseFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."Our customers are very happy when we provide them with the interface... They can check how many attacks they have faced and how many attacks have been blocked."
"It's very flexible and we can easily deploy it to our network. It's very user-friendly. We can do everything via the web interface and troubleshoot easily from the CLI. It's not complicated."
"The stability is okay and we have not encountered problems with the solution."
"Its scalability is big. It is for large deployments of big organizations and service providers."
"The stateless device format means that the box is very strong for preventing DDoS attacks."
"I like all the features together as a whole."
"Analytics and its attack mitigation capabilities are valuable features of the solution."
"It's just one dashboard with mitigation. You decide which mitigation you want and at what threshold to do this or that. Its operation is pretty simple. It's easy."
"The tool's machine learning and artificial intelligence help to prevent attacks by analyzing real-time traffic."
"Recently, our company has been facing difficulties due to attacks originating from the Russian Federation. DefenseFlow has proven to be a highly effective solution in protecting our customers."
"An improvement to Arbor DDoS would be to make evaluation licenses and virtual machines available."
"If we want to see live traffic, we can see do so. But once an attack that lasts for five minutes is done, the data is no longer there. It would be an improvement if we could see recent traffic in the dashboard. We can check and download live traffic, but a past attack, with all the details, such as why it happened and how to mitigate and prevent such future attacks, would be helpful to see."
"For troubleshooting problems, it's not so intuitive. It's not straightforward. This is the core of their kernel, so they need to improve it a little bit... In F5 I have full control of everything."
"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."
"There is some room for AI to take place."
"They should improve the reporting section and make it a little bit more detailed. I would like to have much better and more detailed reports."
"We need a SaaS model for the solution."
"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."
"Its documentation is not 100% clear, making it the weakest aspect of Radware. We have encountered some difficulties in understanding how to configure it correctly."
"Radware DefenseFlow should add new features and algorithms to make it efficient."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 46 reviews while Radware DefenseFlow is ranked 23rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 2 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefenseFlow is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A critical solution for security, as it includes features that can automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefenseFlow writes "A security solution to protect networks with extensive troubleshooting". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Radware DefensePro, Cloudflare, Corero, Imperva DDoS and A10 Thunder TPS, whereas Radware DefenseFlow is most compared with Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.