AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sauce Labs Logo
272 views|146 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
11,079 views|6,835 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

More AutonomIQ TestIQ Pros →

"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes.""It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications.""Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways.""The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel.""With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files.""I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.""We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."

More OpenText UFT One Pros →

Cons
"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

More AutonomIQ TestIQ Cons →

"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts.""Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.""One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all.""The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources.""Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected.""I am not sure if they have a vision of how they want to position the leads in the market, because if you look at Tosca, Tosca is one of the automation tools that have a strategy, and it recently updated its strategy with SAP. They are positioning them as a type of continuous testing automation tool. And if you notice Worksoft, particularly the one tool for your enterprise application, your Worksoft is positioning. I am not sure if Micro Focus UFT has a solid strategy in place. They must differentiate themselves so that people recognize Micro Focus UFT for that reason.""[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution.""They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

More OpenText UFT One Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."
  • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ.
    Top Answer:AutonomIQ TestIQ is only available on mobile devices and on the web. I wish to see AutonomIQ TestIQ in a different area, like game automation or game testing. There is no tool or support offered in… more »
    Top Answer:AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool from SoftLab. My company uses the solution since it is a low-code and no-code automation tool. AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool with which you don't require to use coding and can… more »
    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well… more »
    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on… more »
    Ranking
    20th
    Views
    272
    Comparisons
    146
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    561
    Rating
    9.0
    2nd
    Views
    11,079
    Comparisons
    6,835
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    694
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
    Learn More
    Sauce Labs
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Run your automated tests in parallel to improve results velocity by 10x or more and give your development teams the fast feedback they need. Quickly and easily update your existing Selenium and Appium scripts to run on the Sauce Labs Continuous Testing Cloud.

    Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Insurance Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AutonomIQ TestIQ is ranked 20th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews. AutonomIQ TestIQ is rated 9.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutonomIQ TestIQ writes "A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". AutonomIQ TestIQ is most compared with , whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.