We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager eight out of 10 for stability."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"The tried and tested services that Oracle provides is second to none."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager has eased the responsibilities among our DBAs. We can now assign individual tasks to separate DBAs."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"The dashboards are great for gathering analytic information and seeing where the problems are."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"The interface could be more friendly for basic users."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 36th in Server Monitoring while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases. See our Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.