We performed a comparison between AWS AppSync and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."Support for multiple data sources and formats is a fantastic feature."
"What's most valuable in Zapier is its simplicity, seamlessness, and smooth plug-in, so you won't need to build code for every action. I'm not a developer, but I can use Zapier."
"Zapier is user friendly and makes it easy to integrate different tools. It has a drag and drop functionality which makes it easy to connect environments."
"The ability to connect web applications to trigger actions in another app after having enriched, formatted, delayed, grouped, and filtered is really valuable for many businesses."
"Zapier's interface, for me, is the solution's greatest value proposition. It is designed and developed for people who don't have a clue about what they're trying to do. It has a very user-friendly interface."
"Zapier luckily has a wide range of integrations, I would say."
"The initial setup is pretty easy to do."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is very intuitive and has a very flat learning curve."
"We find it effortless to set up. We really don't have to do anything other than finding the application in the Zapier catalog. And as long as the application has been re-integrated into Zapier, they're able to then just provide the connection details and hook it up."
"Moving to other clouds is impossible without significantly rearchitecting your applications."
"I think that this solution should have more apps connected to it."
"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."
"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"
"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."
"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."
"System-to-system is fine, but when it comes to system-to-user, where Zapier is helping to communicate to a user, that's a one-way communication. If that user has to perform some action on that notification, the action isn't handled by Zapier. So there's no way to orchestrate that and it's very cumbersome."
"My biggest concern with Zapier would be their pricing strategy."
"The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors."
Earn 20 points
AWS AppSync is ranked 25th in Cloud Data Integration while Zapier is ranked 9th in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. AWS AppSync is rated 9.0, while Zapier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS AppSync writes "Innovative, works well with GraphQL, and can connect to any type of data source". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zapier writes "A tool for automation purposes requiring an easy initial setup while offering a very helpful technical support team ". AWS AppSync is most compared with AWS Glue, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Workato and Perspectium DataSync, whereas Zapier is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer, Coefficient, Tray.io and MuleSoft Composer.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.