We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is scalability."
"The most valuable features currently are glue studio, jobs, and triggers."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"It's fairly straightforward as a product; it's not very complicated."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."
"It works best with Oracle."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Oracle GoldenGate are the schema application and performance."
"We use the tool to pull on-prem data."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"It scales well. You can either have it working in with the databases, or you can move it outside. It's got the ability to parallelize up, so you can certainly extract and replay the data from your databases in parallel. So it does have horizontal scalability. That is probably one of its stronger features, the ability just to automatically parallelize the replay and playing of data to allow to scale to large volumes."
"The monitoring is not that good."
"The product is expensive for data streaming. This area needs improvement."
"The setup and installation is a bit complex without advanced knowledge or training."
"While working on AWS Glue, I could not find any training material for it."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution could be cheaper. The price of the solution is an area that needs improvement."
"Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"Additional performance metrics should be added and visible in a dashboard, displayed in a detailed manner."
"Monitoring must be a bit more enhanced."
"Oracle GoldenGate's installation is not user-friendly, we had to read a lot of documentation for the setup and configuration."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and SAP Data Services. See our AWS Glue vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.