We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the OCR, which I use for reading PDFs."
"We use Azure Stack for migration, application modernization, and cloud-native modernization."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Stack is its ability to store and process large amounts of data."
"The setup is very straightforward and it's quite stable."
"You can scale the solution if you need to."
"The solution pairs well with other MS services and saves us a lot of money."
"If a user wants to upgrade Office 365 from any of the packages, there is no disruption happening during migration, and the data is kept safe. There's no loss of data."
"The solution is certainly stable."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The solution can scale well."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"It would be better to have more services and functionality when it comes to database software and computing."
"It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools."
"In the future, I would like to see more machine learning features."
"There are some minor issues or bugs with it that I know are there."
"Some tools do not run without the internet."
"For some years, Azure has been working on Synapse. It's their big footprint on the analytics stack. It's a little bit heavy right now in the sense that there are too many components and it's too complex."
"The visibility of its SDN feature needs improvement."
"I think the monitoring tools needs some improvement."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The speed of the answers could be improved in customer service and support."
"The pricing can be better."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 61 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 6th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 10 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Google Anthos and VMware Software Defined Data Center, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Azure Stack vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
