• Home
  • Bright vs. HCL AppScan

Bright vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bright Logo
Bright
124 views|54 comparisons
HCLTech Logo
HCL AppScan
Read 41 HCL AppScan reviews
5,387 views|4,135 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
June 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bright and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2024).
Download the complete report
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Bright?
AnanyaRoy
A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

    • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about HCL AppScan?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
    Read all 18 answers   →
    What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?
    Top Answer:Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its… more »
    Read all 21 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?
    Top Answer:I mainly use AppScan to secure various types of applications. I use its DAFDAT solution for black box scanning, as well as SaaS and source code validation. AppScan helps in scanning code for… more »
    Read all 19 answers   →
    Ranking
    41st
    out of 71 in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    Views
    124
    Comparisons
    54
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    out of 71 in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    Views
    5,387
    Comparisons
    4,135
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NexPloit, NexDast
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Bright
    HCLTech
    Overview

    A Developer-Centric Enterprise Dynamic Application Security Testing Platform.

    DevOps moves quickly, and security isn’t keeping up. Developers are frustrated with security, AppSec professionals are exhausted, and security bottlenecks keep getting worse. As a result, vulnerabilities are pushed into production, increasing your organization’s risk of cyber attacks.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    June 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bright is ranked 41st in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) while HCL AppScan is ranked 11th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 41 reviews. Bright is rated 0.0, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Bright is most compared with , whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.