Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Bright
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
41st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (9th)
Invicti
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (20th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the market share of Bright is 0.0% and it increased by 13.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of Invicti is 1.1% and it decreased by 22.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories:
Application Security Tools
1.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2023
A safe solution used to detective vulnerabilities for dynamic and complex testing
We use this solution to initialize our applications before releasing them to our clients. The first step is deploying our application and scanning it using Invicti. We configure the scanner for our application’s specific server issues, types, and language. After the scan is complete, Invicti will…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
"The price should be 20% lower"
"It is competitive in the security market."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
52%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate ...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

NexPloit, NexDast
Mavituna Netsparker
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.