We performed a comparison between Broadcom Control Compliance Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance."I find the vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization feature valuable."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"Even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."
"With RSA Archer, an admin can set permissions for a normal user to go directly to the tool they need to input some data. Admins can then go through that and approve some requests. Also, they can log in based on these kinds of permissions, including ticketing, service patches, or upgrades."
"The support mechanism can be improved."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"Archer could be improved by having more customization. I'm not sure if the backend processes have API calls and those kinds of seamless integrations, but from the front, some of the solutions are very out-of-the-box. It's not customizable, so that could be a little problematic since you have to use their features. In terms of the backend structure, I'm not too sure because I'm not a developer—I was an end user and product owner of Archer—and I don't quite know the backend and developmental features. But since it's an out-of-the-box solution, sometimes customization was challenging and support was a little problematic because we had to reach out to them all the time."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"In a future release, there should be an option to upload the main data."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
More Broadcom Control Compliance Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is ranked 8th in IT Governance while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Governance with 38 reviews. Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Control Compliance Suite writes "A good security tool for vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.