Centilytics vs CoreStack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
3,874 views|1,802 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Centilytics Logo
78 views|48 comparisons
CoreStack Logo
158 views|109 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Centilytics and CoreStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
786,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."
  • "Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."
  • "What I can advise is to trial the product, taking advantage of the Turbonomic pre-sales implemention support and kickstart training."
  • "Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."
  • "You should understand the cost of your physical servers and how much time and money you are spending year over year on expanding your virtual farm."
  • "Price is a big one. VMTurbo was very competitively priced."
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."
  • More IBM Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
    786,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have not seen Turbonomic's new pricing since IBM purchased it. When we were looking at it in my previous company… more »
    Top Answer:I would like Turbonomic to add more services, especially in the cloud area. I have already told them this. They can add… more »
    Top Answer:I mostly provide it to my clients. There are multiple reasons why they would use it depending on the client's needs and… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Interactive Demo
    Centilytics
    Demo Not Available
    CoreStack
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by customers to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. Common use cases include cloud cost optimization, cloud migration planning, data center modernization, FinOps acceleration, Kubernetes optimization, sustainable IT, and application resource management. Turbonomic customers report an average 33% reduction in cloud and infrastructure waste without impacting application performance, and return-on-investment of 471% over three years. Ready to take a closer look? Explore the interactive demo or start your free 30-day trial today!

    Cloud Visibility acts as a single pane of glass for your multi-cloud infrastructure. It aggregates terabytes of your unstructured data into interactive graphical dashboards and customized reports that can be downloaded in various formats.

    You can slice & dice the data using an advanced set of filters such as – account ids, subscriptions, services, regions, resource tags and much more.

    Reduce your time and effort to analyze and charge back various business categories (such as cost-centers, applications or owners).

    CoreStack® Enterprise Enables You to be agile and eliminate waste while proactively mitigating risks by making your cloud governance intelligent and autonomous. It applies Cloud-as-Code™ approach to govern the four critical components of your cloud

    Sample Customers
    IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
    Nasscom, LRN, Yoma Group
    CAMS
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Cost Management
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: June 2024.
    786,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Centilytics is ranked 23rd in Cloud Cost Management while CoreStack is ranked 22nd in Cloud Cost Management. Centilytics is rated 0.0, while CoreStack is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Centilytics is most compared with , whereas CoreStack is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.