We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Network Security and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that we have found most valuable are the SSL VPN and the User Portal."
"Fortinet FortiGate is easy to use."
"Anti-Spam web content filterinG."
"Fortinet offers the latest versions to cater to the needs of enterprises."
"It's user-friendly and easy to operate."
"The integration with Active Directory is one of the good features. Most of the customers are now looking for the Single Sign-on feature. So, being able to integrate Active Directory with the firewall is useful. It is also easy."
"The performance is good."
"The solution is very easy to understand. It's not overly complex."
"Auto-scaling and zero touch are valuable features."
"We primarily secure our network using CloudGuard Network Security's next-generation firewall features, including anti-spam, IPS, and URL filtering. Our chosen package for the go-to-market strategy is NGTP. For customers seeking more features, we provide options to upgrade to the tool's advanced packages."
"The program is very stable."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"The 24/7 online customer support services enhance effective operations and provide quick services in case of a system failure."
"The notifications, the visibility, and the deployment are the most valuable. It could be packaged in such a way that it took a lot of time and resources off our hands, so it was more efficient."
"It's possible to sync the Check Point Management with the cloud portal, therefore allowing automated rules to be set in place whenever creating a new VM."
"The SSL spectrum proved to be the most valuable for our incoming connections."
"They now know the details about their network traffic that they did not know before: Applications that they are using and some application they did not know they were using."
"It scales linearly with load and no issues."
"The most valuable feature is the Posture Assessment."
"We can monitor the traffic manually and detect threats. Additionally, we can block different IP addresses and URLs."
"The main advantage of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series stems from the fact that you can access it with the help of cloud services."
"Using Palo Alto Networks Panorama, we were able to deploy a single point of management and visualization of the firewall infrastructure in cloud, on-premise and integrated with Azure to automate scale up. Its security features, i.e. anti-malware, threat prevention, URL Filtering, VPN, and antivirus are the most valuable. The ID-User integrated with AD and 2FA features are also very useful to provide secure access to servers and some users in the company. "
"The interface with Panorama makes it very easy to use."
"The solution strengthens our IT posture."
"The stability of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."
"I would like reporting to be improved and should offer a lot more tools to monitor the products."
"If they had better integration with security products, such as Cisco ISE or Rapid Threat Containment, then it would be an improvement."
"Some of the web policy reports could be improved."
"It would be a benefit if Fortinet would release a one-stop solution that is better integrated with other products and an automated emergency response system."
"With the addition of some features, it is possible that FortiGate can be used in all verticals."
"We would like to see better pricing."
"The search tool needs improvement. It's very difficult to search for policies right now."
"Its architecture and user interface need improvement. The user experience for this solution also needs to be improved, particularly in implementation, management, and operations."
"The initial setup is complex and could be made simpler."
"CheckPoint CloudGuard could be better at solving cases."
"This application can be more integrated with web application firewalls. Better integrations would provide more granularity, which would be helpful for focusing on the application itself and preventing attacks. It would be good to include the cross-domain search. If you have multiple firewalls that are managed on the same platform and you want to check who is using some particular objects or where a specific ID is being used, it should provide an option for this kind of search instead of having to check one by one on each firewall."
"Micro-Segmentation functionality for EAST-WEST traffic is not native and requires integration with a third-party OEM."
"In case the device is inaccessible due to some issue such as CPU or memory, there is no separate port or hardware partition provided for troubleshooting purposes."
"There is a limitation with the version upgrade. We are using version 81.10 and from what I understand, it is problematic to upgrade this version. I do not know if that is true."
"The solution could improve to have a DLP feature."
"The implementation should be simplified."
"Palo Alto should update their documentation to make it more readable and provide easier-to-follow instructions through videos."
"The only minor issue we've faced is with the app's ID configuration, which requires specific matching for application filtering."
"There should be an option for direct integration with the Azure platform."
"Just sometimes it can be a bit sluggish navigating through pages. That is just purely because of Java."
"There are some delays that I have observed when my company communicates with Palo Alto's support engineers."
"There could be dynamic DNS features similar to Fortinet in the product."
"From time to time, they have released some content updates that have some issues, maybe twice a year."
More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 121 reviews while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 11th in Firewalls with 53 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security writes "Highly reliable, great visibility, and centralized management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is most compared with Azure Firewall, VMware NSX, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Firewall and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, whereas Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Netgate pfSense. See our Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.