We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"The solution offers sophisticated security techniques with unique characteristics that can be particularly valuable for the financial sector, which is where we develop apps."
"It helps us streamline our revenue streams, and we're spending less money on application security."
"It seamlessly protects through machine learning, giving us visibility into potential attacks and where they come from."
"The portal is quite intuitive."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."
"Its ability to adapt to our applications and ensure our security policies are followed is a big plus."
"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."
"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."
"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"The documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly."
"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."
"They need improved latency in the main window."
"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"The validation process needs to be sped up."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."
"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."
"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."
"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.