We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a cross-platform tool."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"It is easy to use. It is usually easy to recover someone's privacy. The manageability is much easier than McAfee. I think that Microsoft is a leader in this area. We are in the Microsoft school so our judgment of McAfee will be a little bit unfair as we recommend Microsoft all the time because of the easy manageability and support. I think that McAfee is designed for a different customer and every time we open a ticket with their support, it takes a very, very long time. The main difference is just the manageability and support. In terms of the solution itself or the functionality, I know that McAfee is very strong, but manageability and support, for us, is much more important. It's strengthens the solution for us."
"Microsoft BitLocker's most valuable features are stability and simplicity in terms of usage."
"The solution has a feature that automatically asks the users to upgrade their password once we set up the process."
"We have not seen any bugs or glitches, so the stability is good."
"The most important aspect of this solution is that if your laptop gets stolen, the information is encrypted."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"It maintains security on my computer. Since I travel a lot, it gives me confidence that if, for some reason, my computer is lost, my data won't be compromised."
"It is easy to implement and has AD integration."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"I would like to be able to encrypt our cloud tenancy."
"The pricing should be improved."
"The product must improve the centralization of keys."
"The solution lacks the ability to allow its user to provide limited access to someone."
"The customizations could be more flexible."
"The deployment process regarding prerequisites and automation could be easy to understand."
"Microsoft BitLocker needs to be an all-inclusive solution. For example, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor is required to use Bitlocker with your computer which keeps Bitlocker from adoption beyond Windows."
"They can improve the security of the application and include an encryption disk in the next feature."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "A solution that prevents unauthorized access and goes beyond security measures to provide protection to its users". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Boxcryptor. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Microsoft BitLocker report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.