Checkmarx One vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (11th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Tenable.io Web Application ...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the market share of Checkmarx One is 13.2% and it decreased by 13.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.9% and it increased by 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
Unique Categories:
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.2%
Vulnerability Management
1.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

KannanPadmanabhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 13, 2023
Used for static comprehension testing and helps us detect vulnerabilities early
We mainly use this solution for static comprehension testing We use it for non-functional insight because it's a security vulnerability scanner. We can use Checkmarx for scanning anytime on our code base. We integrated that as part of our build-a-pipeline, and it helps us detect early. We have…
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods
The fundamental objective of this product is to enhance the overall security, be it through verification within the organization or at the user's end All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. We…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The UI is user-friendly."
"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."
"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."
"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use."
"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."
"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."
"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."
"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."
"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."
 

Cons

"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."
"Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?"
"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."
"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."
"The report customization needs to be better."
"The platform's technical support services could be better."
"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."
"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."
"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."
"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."
"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."
"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."
"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."
"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."
"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."
"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
"The pricing is okay."
"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users.
What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
The platform's technical support services could be better.
What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
Implementing Tenable.io Web Application Scanning has been beneficial in identifying numerous vulnerabilities within application code. I rate its scanning capabilities in terms of user-friendliness ...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
IMDEX
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.