We compared Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Huawei Wireless is praised for its connectivity, performance, design, and battery life, with a focus on customer service and deployment times. D-Link Wireless highlights fast and reliable connectivity, range, and security features, with positive feedback on customer service and pricing. Huawei could improve signal strength and device compatibility, while D-Link could enhance connectivity and setup simplicity.
Features: Huawei Wireless stands out for its efficient performance, reliable signal strength, and user-friendly interface. It also offers a sleek design, extensive coverage range, long battery life, and advanced security features. In comparison, D-Link Wireless excels in fast and reliable connectivity, excellent range, strong signal strength, easy setup process, strong security features, and compatibility with various devices.
Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is praised for its reasonable and competitive pricing. Its setup cost is regarded as straightforward and hassle-free, ensuring a smooth installation process. Users appreciate the easily obtained and flexible licensing options. In contrast, D-Link Wireless is also considered reasonable and affordable in terms of pricing and setup cost, but user reviews do not explicitly mention its licensing aspect., Huawei Wireless has been shown to contribute positively to ROI, according to user feedback. Meanwhile, users express satisfaction with D-Link Wireless, highlighting its reliable performance and versatility.
Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless could improve its signal strength, compatibility with devices, user interface, durability, and longevity based on user feedback. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless could benefit from enhancements in connectivity, speed, range, signal stability, and simpler setup and configuration processes, according to user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on Huawei Wireless suggests varying durations for deployment and setup, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, D-Link Wireless had users mentioning a three-month deployment and a week for setup, but it is noted that sometimes these terms can refer to the same period., The customer service and support for Huawei Wireless are highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and expertise. Users have reported a professional and efficient experience. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless also receives praise for their responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful customer service, with users reporting positive experiences and satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The solution is stable."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"D-Link Wireless is a tool that is used since it is an easy and user-friendly product."
"D-Link is a good product that is quite affordable and I recommend it."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"This product is user-friendly and we can manage it as per the requirements of the user."
"The connectivity is good."
"This is an affordable product that offers good performance. This is why it is popular with our customers. It offers good speed and bandwidth."
"It's scalable, user friendly, and easy to manage."
"The setup process is very easy."
"It has all of the features that we need."
"At the moment, I only have experience with the on-premise deployment of Huawei Wireless, but the cloud solution looks good on paper. It looks perfect. I can say that Huawei's cybersecurity is very good, stable, and works for long periods. My company has four devices running uptime for more than four years without stopping. I also like that the support for Huawei Wireless is swift, and support does precisely what you require, at least from the point of view of the technical engineer who communicated with Huawei support, as I'm more of a technical sales guy. Good technical support is vital to my company, partners, and customers. My company had this ongoing project with an ISP provider in Bulgaria that bought some routers. Still, the existing equipment was a completely different brand, so this provider wanted to migrate to Huawei Wireless and wanted help while migrating the existing infrastructure to Huawei, so the technical engineer assigned to raise the ticket with Huawei for checking and setting parameters correctly provided feedback about Huawei technical support being good quality-wise and TAT-wise. The technical engineer was also Cisco-certified and Juniper-certified and was not experienced with Huawei equipment. Still, he did mention that the Huawei Wireless router interface was straightforward, and even a person who's new to it would find it easy to configure. Huawei Wireless is user-friendly, which is another pro of the solution. It's easy to manage, and even the program language setting can be done with fewer commands than Juniper and Cisco equipment. Some of the features in Juniper need an external program, and the same features can be found in Huawei Wireless built-in, which I find remarkable."
"It is easy to set up."
"We can use an access point to broadcast multiple SSIDs, assign dynamic VLANs, and configure dynamic access control lists (ACLs)."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"We've found the solution to be quite stable."
"Installation is easy."
"This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The price could be better."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Password restriction: Sometimes we set a password and it uses that password but, after some days/months, the password gets changed and a few laptops still use old the password while a few use the new password. The password restriction option needs to improve."
"D-Link has some catching up to do in terms of advancing and improving its technology."
"D-Link Wireless’s stability needs improvement."
"Sometimes, the solution needs to be restarted."
"The solution's performance could be improved."
"In future, it would also be good to have a switch within D Link that works as well as the Cisco 9200 Switch."
"It would definitely help if we had more advanced features for distributing bandwidth."
"The performance offered by D-Link Wireless can be a bit problematic at times, owing to which it is an area that can be considered for improvement."
"The technical support needs to be improved. They also need to produce some more technical guides."
"They should actually first test the equipment thoroughly and then launch it. Sometimes, things come out too soon, before they are ready."
"Support could be a bit faster."
"The solution needs to include a captive portal."
"While technically proficient, enhancing communication skills would greatly benefit the customer experience."
"Technical support could be better."
"I have already integrated the radius system with Cisco and Huawei products, but it can be further improved to be more user-friendly and easier to use."
"The security of the solution could be better in the future."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
D-Link Wireless is ranked 12th in Wireless LAN with 15 reviews while Huawei Wireless is ranked 10th in Wireless LAN with 33 reviews. D-Link Wireless is rated 8.0, while Huawei Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of D-Link Wireless writes "Highly reliable, provides wireless access to resources, and supports new technologies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Wireless writes "Customizable and has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, and smart antennas". D-Link Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Omada Access Points, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Huawei Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Fortinet FortiAP. See our D-Link Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
