We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."
"The solution is very stable."
"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"The support is horrible."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 18 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot and Hitachi TrueCopy. See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.