We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Elastic Security is a highly flexible platform that can be implemented anywhere."
"Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because of Elastic's efficient search engine."
"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."
"Elastic has a lot of beats, such as Winlogbeat and Filebeat. Beats are the agents that have to be installed on the terminals to send the data. When we install beats or Elastic agents on every terminal, they don't overload the terminals. In other SIEM solutions such as Splunk or QRadar, when beats or agents are installed on endpoints, they are very heavy for the terminals. They consume a lot of power of the terminals, whereas Elastic agents hardly consume any power and don't overload the terminals."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the prevention methods and the incident alerts."
"It can handle millions of loads at a time, and you can always use the filters to find exactly what you are looking for and detect errors in every log message you are searching for, basically."
"We've found the initial setup to be quite straightforward."
"Elastic is straightforward, easy to integrate, and highly customizable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of use."
"It's easy to set up and quick to deploy."
"The solution provides good accessibility and is not heavy on resources when there are updates or when it is in operation."
"They do a program where you can renew for three years. It's very reasonable, as far as the cost per year, because you can renew for three years. They will also do multiple computers, so I actually protect all my family computers, as well as my work computers, all under one license. This means I only have to deal with re-upping my license once every three years. That's the big thing for me."
"The software and hardware inventory that you can create by using the console is valuable. It is also very light on hardware resources."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the protection itself, which works well for us."
"Primarily used to protect computers from viruses and ransomware."
"The ability to push policies and also to restrict an installation or to restrict any form of threat within the policy has been quite useful."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language."
"One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty."
"We're using the open-source edition, for now, I think maybe they can allow their OLED plugin to be open source, as at the moment it is commercialised."
"The solution's query building is not that intuitive compared to other solutions."
"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."
"This type of monitoring is not very mature just yet. We need more real-time information in a way that's easier to manage."
"The interface is good. However, it could always be better. It could be more user-friendly."
"It would be great to have VIP functions added to the solution in a future release."
"I'm unsure as to if they could actually support a large enterprise."
"We would like to see more options in the help menu for users."
"I've had a few other instances where the program stops running, and then you have to restore and reset it."
"I'm not aware of any areas that need improvement."
"Dual management for the customer, who needs to access the local on-premise console from a remote cloud-based console."
"The user interface of ESET Endpoint Security could be more user-friendly and more features could be added."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 59 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiEDR. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.