We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The technical support is among the best in the market."
"From my experience, the visual aid that it provides is most valuable. There are charts and other means to provide information."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the dashboard, which allows us to see everything on the same page and provides easy visibility into problems."
"The visibility is amazing with easy dashboard creation."
"The ability to manage large amounts of generated data and to protect all devices from unauthorized use are the most valuable features."
"We used it to create a custom anomaly detection data model to monitor the activity of our back-end services on an hourly basis relative to the past three months of activity."
"You can use it to gather syslog messages from anything."
"It gives us the liberty to do more in terms of use cases."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"The solution could use a different licensing model."
"Splunk is not very user-friendly. It has a complex architecture in comparison to other solutions on the market."
"Splunk does not build apps. They only go back and validate the apps that somebody has already built. They should have remote consulting support. They have a wonderful solution. They have 24/7 security. Nobody needs to depend on any third party and will therefore just buy Splunk on the cloud."
"The setup time is quite long."
"On-premises scaling of the solution is a bit more limited than it is on the cloud."
"The historical data extraction needs improvement. I would like the capability of taking data and having it trend longer."
"The threat detection system has room for improvement."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 245 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.