We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We receive a lot of insights from this product."
"The product is user-friendly."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"Forcepoint offers many policies that conform to global DLP best practices, including requirements specific to regions like the Middle East, Europe, etc. They have a policy database in their product. That feature is unique to Forcepoint. Their AI and fingerprinting are incredibly effective and robust. We have tested it multiple times. It always catches the correct data being leaked."
"The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"We like the ability to customize our requirements and rules, as well as its ease of use and management. It also has a cloud feature and proxy functionality."
"Has multiple modules and is good with integration."
"It's fast and it prepares loss reports."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"We are able to check the log and keep records."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"None of the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention features worked well, but the solution had a straightforward setup."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."
"You have to monitor the solution all the time."
"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"One area that could be improved is the support. The current support is not very good. Because they don't come on time when a customer really needs it, they take a lot of time to troubleshoot anything."
"They need to improve their reporting feature as well as the incident response."
"We want to be able to do data classification better in the product and reduce false positives, especially on data loss prevention."
"The tool needs to integrate data classification."
"When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems."
"Feature requests do take some time to implement."
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
"Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Digital Guardian and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.