We performed a comparison between Genesys Cloud CX and Microsoft Dynamics CRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Genesys, Five9 and others in Contact Center Platforms."Its comprehensive single application includes everything from reporting to IVR and workflows."
"Predictive engagement and gamification are valuable features with good inbound functionality."
"The stability is really good."
"What's most valuable in Genesys Cloud is that it's a complete cloud solution, so it's reliable and 99.99% available. It's also elastic. Genesys Cloud also has chatbots, which I find valuable."
"Genesys Cloud is an excellent platform."
"What's most valuable in Genesys Cloud is that it's easier to use because everything is already built. Another valuable feature of Genesys Cloud is drag-and-drop."
"The latest version and updates have been great. It really has everything we need."
"The most valuable features include being an omnichannel solution with customer journey insights, full reporting, and continuous updates based on consumer feedback through their portal."
"Compared to other partners, the most valuable aspect of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is its intuitive APIs, which are customizable and allow for the addition of multiple parameters and attributes. This feature enhances the purpose call in our services. Additionally, the learning curve for contact center agents using Microsoft Dynamics CRM is shorter than with other solution providers. Finally, the commercial aspects of Microsoft Dynamics CRM are superior to those of other solution providers."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM has good integration with the Microsoft Stack of solutions. However, the Salesforce ecosystem is stronger."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM brings the most value in terms of its ease of implementation."
"My access to Microsoft Dynamics CRM is limited, so I can only access the feature of registering the pipeline and activities. That feature is enough for me to do the job, and is what I find most valuable in the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is the flexibility with Microsoft Office 365."
"Our clients appreciate that the solution can be used to monitor everything their customer interacts with in their business."
"It integrates well with other Microsoft products."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is the campaign feature."
"AI still needs improvement when it comes to predictive engagement."
"The whole process of creating an agent is quite long and automating quite a bit of that would be very helpful."
"Reporting isn't the best feature of Genesys Cloud and could be improved. You can't customize reports and applications on Genesys Cloud."
"One area for improvement in Genesys Cloud is providing users with more autonomy in troubleshooting and accessing logs."
"Issues can happen during technical troubleshooting, which is completely out of our hands compared to the on-premise solution."
"The tool's pricing could be more flexible, and there should be clearer indications of consumption and fair usage policies."
"Process automation in Genesys Cloud is an area for improvement. It's quite a new feature and still has room for improvement."
"I would like to see some of that functionality or features from Genesys Engage added to Genesys Cloud."
"The main issue with Microsoft Dynamics CRM is that its GUI isn't very attractive. Overall, the solution has the same functionalities as other CRMs such as Salesforce, but Salesforce is much simpler to use. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is complicated to use, and this is another area for improvement. It was also more difficult to set up the solution, so its setup could still be improved. What I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a cleaner user interface because currently, it looks messy to me. Salesforce CRM has a better, more simplified user interface that makes it easier for you to get what you need, while in Microsoft Dynamics CRM, you have to put in a lot of effort to get things done."
"It is difficult to qualify opportunity in Microsoft Dynamics CRM."
"When it comes to any necessary changes or updates, we have issues. It is not very agnostic in terms of working with other platforms. A lot of data transformation had to be done internally in order to send it to various systems."
"The setup with other email servers, other than Microsoft Outlook, could be improved. Alternatively, we'd like to have some feature that allows us to send emails directly from our inboxes to the CRM and assign it to a certain client."
"We had to do some customizations on top and it got a bit cumbersome."
"The solution's interface has room for improvement."
"This solution would be easier to use if everything was displayed on one page, to avoid moving from one tab to another tab to add documents or add comments."
"The installation was difficult. I'm not the person that implements the solution. However, to have the solution function in the correct way, the process can be difficult."
Genesys Cloud CX is ranked 2nd in Contact Center Platforms with 9 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics CRM is ranked 1st in CRM Customer Engagement Centers with 68 reviews. Genesys Cloud CX is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genesys Cloud CX writes "Offers built-in AI functionality, broad third-party integrations, out-of-the-box AI features and designed specifically for contact centers ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics CRM writes "Intuitive APIs, customizable design, but dashboards could improve". Genesys Cloud CX is most compared with Genesys PureConnect, Amazon Connect, Five9, NICE CXone and Cisco CCX, whereas Microsoft Dynamics CRM is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, SAP CRM, ServiceNow, Siebel CRM and monday.com.
We monitor all Contact Center Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.