GitLab vs Rally Software comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GitLab
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (6th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)
Rally Software
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
116
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the market share of GitLab is 31.9% and it increased by 38.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Rally Software is 6.3% and it decreased by 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Unique Categories:
Application Security Tools
3.7%
Build Automation
24.4%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
7.6%
 

Featured Reviews

HA
May 16, 2023
Efficiently streamlines and automates tasks
My primary use case is for creating pipelines and automation workflows By streamlining tasks that we used to do on a daily basis and scheduling them. CI/CD, GitLab scanning, and the cloud are the most valuable features.  There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents.  I would like to see more…
SD
Apr 20, 2023
A solution that enables users to accurately estimate the time required for building large software projects
I don't have any specific suggestions for improvement regarding the solution because we are currently satisfied with all aspects. Our usage requirements are relatively straightforward, and we haven't encountered any significant challenges or complexities. Therefore, I don't have any valuable suggestions to provide at this time. I hear from some people that it could be customized, but they don't have details on how. Customization is possibly a desirable feature, and I don't know if it is available in the system. Customization features may not be exposed or unavailable, so people may be looking for them. So, customization is an area people have told me is more desirable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."
"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the ability to upload scripts and make changes when needed and then reupload them. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management."
"Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective."
"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."
"The metrics - collecting metrics. It's because we've used several other tools in the past, and they don't give you a full indication of how well your teams are performing, at a portfolio level, at a product level, and at the team level."
"It helps me evaluate teams' historical performance using velocity charts."
"It drives the conversation behind some of the pain points the teams have, based on the data that we're able to pull out of the system. As a result of that, we're able to make better decisions, to become better as a whole."
"It's a good platform to keep track of all the user stories across all projects. So rather than having one off Excel spreadsheets with all of the requirements, it is a good place to have all of that."
"The product has excellent customizable reports."
"With this product, searching for historical information or the evolution of the requirement, detecting conflict between projects has helped a lot."
"Reporting is much easier and faster than Micro Focus ALM, with CA AC built on web services... Also, the data is more granular when it comes to tasks, iterations, sprints, and releases."
"The configurable Portfolio Management and parent-child relationships."
 

Cons

"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."
"The documentation is confusing."
"It can be free for commercial use."
"I would like to have some features to support peer review."
"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."
"I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important."
"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."
"I think there is a missing link with the development activity. Some developers are pushing in new versions of the code, but you cannot make the link from the user story to a specific application version."
"I wish there was a view, like the Kanban view, where you could see the parent, and see all the children visually, so you could drag and drop where you want it to go. Something like that might help."
"The product needs to have more integration capabilities."
"It could improve by being self-organizing: user stories, different hierarchies, and different perspectives. Not just as a single hierarchical structure, but something that can be multidimensional."
"I'd like the ability to customize reports without having to incur Professional Services, or having to write my own code GitHub and then implement that as a custom report. That's untenable. It's not sustainable."
"I'd like to be able to color code timeboxes, so I have an easy visual way to track the success of sprints."
"I would like to see more Kanban support. As it stands, it doesn't seem to have the features or the layouts that the teams really need to be able to execute their tasks. It almost tries to force you into more of a Scrum style."
"Customization features may not be exposed or unavailable, so people may be looking for them. So, customization is an area people have told me is more desirable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."
"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."
"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."
"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."
"We are currently using the open-source version."
"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."
"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."
"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."
"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."
"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."
"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."
"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."
"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."
"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
78%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers des...
What needs improvement with GitLab?
I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significan...
What do you like most about Rally Software?
We have teams come and go all the time. We have teams in India, America, Ireland, Poland, Italy, England... we are spread out everywhere! Rally is our key tool for scrum planning and our single so...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?
Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable.
What needs improvement with Rally Software?
It is hard to track the changes. For example, we're in sprint 25, and then we have 26, 27, 28, and 29. Throughout that whole time, we're developing pipelines in Azure, moving to GitHub, creating pi...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Fuzzit
CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Rally Software and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.