Grafana Loki vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Grafana Labs Logo
3,809 views|3,379 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
14,619 views|8,945 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Grafana Loki and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: April 2024).
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The best feature of Grafana Loki is that it integrates well with our other tool.""The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is an open-source tool that is stable and flexible.""The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments.""The most valuable feature of Grafana Loki is the dashboards which are really simple to create.""The log collection feature is good and the solution is easily understandable. v""The most valuable feature is the capability to set up alerts, which becomes necessary when we need to receive notifications for specific events.""The solution's stability has never been a problem. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.""I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana."

More Grafana Loki Pros →

"I have found IBM QRadar to be stable.""It has improved comprehensive visibility for what is going on in the perimeters, and on the inside, as well.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is it has very good data correlation.""I like the graphical interface. It's so good and easy.""The most valuable features are all the implementations, the plug-ins, and the User Behavior Analytics (UBA).""The stability is good.""The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis.""The scalability is awesome, because QRadar includes other solutions in the same console."

More IBM Security QRadar Pros →

Cons
"Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring.""Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf.""We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources.""In Grafana Loki, the creation of metrics is not so easy, making it an area that could be made easier.""The correlation of requests is not simple in Grafana Loki and can be improved.""The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement.""There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings.""The product must improve its UI."

More Grafana Loki Cons →

"Whenever we are upgrading or installing any type of patch, at that time we have some delays.""I have noticed a few things while working on this. After the restart of the server, sometimes, the services misbehave, and you need to manually start or restart the service. I have seen that specifically with the Tomcat service. Sometimes, when you click on log sources, instead of opening the log source extension, it redirects you over the internet.""The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling.""The tech support is not that good.""Some UI enhancements would be nice, such as exporting custom event properties and the ability to export rules.""IMB should reduce the pricing, or reduce some of the features for a more economical solution for the customer.""Maybe there should be more custom rules in the exchange. Basically, we are using a lot of threat rules, so maybe they'll develop something like that.""The only challenge is that IBM has been a closed enterprise. It should be more open to integrating with other providers at an enterprise level. We're a bank and the core banking system integration is not way straightforward and there is no integration between IBM and these products. If IBM could open up and provide a way of integrating it seamlessly, without charging more for it, that would make a big difference."

More IBM Security QRadar Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
  • "My company doesn't need to pay for the licensing cost of the solution."
  • "We use a free version."
  • "The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product."
  • "Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
  • More Grafana Loki Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "found other solutions, with more features at the same cost or less. You don’t have to leave the Gartner Magic Quadrant to beat their price."
  • "Most of the time, it is easier and cheaper to buy a new product or the QRadar box."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "Go through a vulnerability assessment review for price breaks. A virtualized solution will also cut down on cost."
  • "It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises."
  • "The maintenance costs are high."
  • "Pricing (based on EPS) will be more accurate."
  • More IBM Security QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Vinod Shankar
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
    Top Answer:Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution.
    Top Answer:There are a few features in the solution's enterprise version that are not given in the normal basic version. Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other… more »
    Top Answer:It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
    Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
    Top Answer:The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,809
    Comparisons
    3,379
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.1
    6th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    14,619
    Comparisons
    8,945
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
    Learn More
    Overview

    Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

    The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

    By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

    Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

    IBM Security QRadar is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.

    IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats. 

    IBM QRadar Log Manager

    To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.

    Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:

    • Data processing and capture on any security event
    • Disaster recovery options and high availability 
    • Scalability for large enterprises
    • SoftLayer cloud installation capability
    • Advanced threat protection

    Reviews from Real Users

    IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.

    Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."

    A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Security Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Grafana Loki is ranked 13th in Log Management with 12 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Grafana Loki is rated 8.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Grafana Loki writes "Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Grafana Loki is most compared with Graylog, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.