We performed a comparison between Graylog Security and Microsoft Sentinel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."We use the solution to collect logs."
"The tool aggregates logs. We can see the logs in one place."
"The most valuable feature is the alert notifications, which are categorized by severity levels: informational, low, medium, and high."
"Log aggregation and data connectors are the most valuable features."
"The in-built SOAR of Sentinel is valuable. Kusto Query Language is also valuable for the ease of writing queries and ease of getting insights from the logs. Schedule-based queries within Sentinel are also valuable. I found these three features most useful for my projects."
"It has a lot of great features."
"The analytic rule is the most valuable feature."
"The features that stand out are the detection engine and its integration with multiple data sources."
"The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent."
"The most valuable features are its threat handling and detection. It's a powerful tool because it's based on machine learning and on the behavior of malware."
"Graylog Security needs to incorporate security scorecards."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"Not all information shows up in Sentinel. Sometimes there are items provided in 365 and if you looked in Sentinel you would not see them and therefore think they do not exist. There can be discrepancies between Microsoft tools."
"I think the number one area of improvement for Sentinel would be the cost."
"Its implementation could be simpler. It is not really simple or straightforward. It is in the middle. Sometimes, connectors are a little bit complex."
"Improvement-wise, I would like to see more integration with third-party solutions or old-school antivirus products that have some kind of logging capability. I wouldn't mind having that exposed within Sentinel. We do have situations where certain companies have bought licensing or have made an investment in a product, and that product will be there for the next two or three years. To be able to view information from those legacy products would be great. We can then better leverage the Sentinel solution and its capabilities."
"The solution should allow for a streamlined CI/CD procedure."
"Multi-tenancy, in my opinion, needs to be improved. I believe it can do better as a managed service provider."
"In terms of features I would like to see in future releases, I'm interested in a few more use cases around automation. I do believe a lot of automation is available, and more is in progress, but that would be my area of interest."
Graylog Security is ranked 34th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Sentinel is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 85 reviews. Graylog Security is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Sentinel is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Graylog Security writes "Helps to collect logs and pricing is cheap ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Sentinel writes "Gives a comprehensive and holistic view of the ecosystem and improves visibility and the ability to respond". Graylog Security is most compared with Wazuh and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Microsoft Sentinel is most compared with AWS Security Hub, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
