GuardRails vs SonarQube comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GuardRails
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
39th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
DevSecOps (10th)
SonarQube
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the market share of GuardRails is 0.1% and it decreased by 2.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of SonarQube is 31.6% and it increased by 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories:
DevSecOps
1.7%
Application Security Tools
27.7%
Software Development Analytics
47.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Use GuardRails?
Share your opinion
Wang Dayong - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2023
Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages
We use the product to review our software codes. We have integrated the product to review our new delivery code When we deliver a code, the solution scans the code and reports whether the code has bugs or any other vulnerability issues. Thus the solution helps us identify issues and improve the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The free version of SonarQube does everything that we need it to."
"The solution is cheaper than other products."
"We are using the Community edition of SonarQube."
"I do not know about the pricing as I am using the community edition, which is free. But I compared the pricing with Sigma, and it is higher than SonarQube."
"We're using the Community Edition, and we don't pay for anything."
"This product is open source and very convenient."
"The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty decent."
"We pay €10 per month for this solution, which is good. It provides a good value for money."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Sonar
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.