We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and Informatica Axon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"The solution is stable."
"It's helpful in integration, and it can be moved around in SharePoint. So, from the SharePoint View, data integration and reporting, it help a lot in that way."
"The tool's most valuable feature is bulk upload. We upload files in CSV or Excel format."
"The best thing about Informatica Axon is that it integrates with the Electronic Data Capture and the Axon system."
"It is a very stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten...It is a scalable solution...Informatica Axon's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is features, interfaces, and data mapping. It represents clusters nicely."
"Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."
"The dictionary, the search, and the ratings are without a doubt the most beneficial components of this solution."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"The GUI needs to be a little more user-friendly and appealing."
"The on-prem version's functionalities may not be available on the cloud version."
"The cloud version of Axon is far behind the on-prem, and many of my clients want to go fully to the cloud. However, Axon has to be an on-prem installation. I would like to see their cloud products catch up with their on-prem capabilities."
"Some functionalities can be a challenge in the cloud."
"The main issue probably has nothing to do with end users, but installation can definitely be simplified."
"The solution still is a bit manual in its functionality. We want t to be more automation-driven."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 19th in Data Governance with 1 review while Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while Informatica Axon is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Collibra Governance, whereas Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and ASG Enterprise Data Intelligence.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Besides features, don't forget to look at user experience and software performance. One of your choices is significantly lacking in both areas. You might consider adding erwin Data Intelligence Suite to your list. Something you might find interesting: Alation vs Collibra vs Quest (erwin) 2022 | Gartner Peer Insights You can change the products you are comparing, seeing how others have rated the tools you are looking at.