We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"We were doing all kinds of paperwork for every type of order and to maintain our assets but with the use of the IBM Maximo application, we can automate a lot of the processes."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"The standard reports that shipped with the package need to be enriched with more advanced reports, especially for the Inventory Management sections."
"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"IBM Maximo can improve the financial support and financial application, to make it more similar to an ERP as opposed to an EAM. Overall they can improve the financial processes."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 6th in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Corrigo Enterprise, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.