We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are log monitoring, easy-to-fix issues, and problem-solving."
"I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable."
"Most valuable features include the granularity of information."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very stable, easy to get going, and easy to manage. It is also easy to review all incidents."
"The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great."
"The playbook engine is flexible and allows for the graphical visualization of processes, enabling the implementation of dynamic playbooks for incident response or testing."
"The solution is reliable."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."
"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."
"We are very happy with the stability of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is its performance and management. Additionally, the solution integrates well."
"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."
"The only problem is that if you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. We would need to increase the storage capacity."
"IBM QRadar could improve the plugins and threat detection."
"I would like for Yara to be supported by all components."
"The initial setup was complex, and it took six months."
"I would suggest QRadar release any documentation or give an online demo, like videos on YouTube. It would increase publicity and public appeal."
"The playbook guide which specifies the rules for security use cases needs to be provided to support in case the organization needs help."
"Integration could be better. They should make it easy to integrate with other solutions."
"You can scale IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, but it has room for improvement."
"Technical support could definitely be better."
"SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve by reducing the price."
"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."
"I would like to see better search functions and better filters in the next release."
More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is ranked 32nd in Log Management with 5 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server writes "Shows login failures and server issues but search functions and filters could be improved". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is most compared with syslog-ng, SolarWinds Log Analyzer, Wazuh, Graylog and ManageEngine Log360. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.