We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is very easy to use and efficient."
"IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It helps scan and mitigates our vulnerabilities using the best protocols to secure our environment."
"The initial setup is simple."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
"We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."
"The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"The customer service and support team can be improved."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing."
"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look."
"IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems."
"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, JBoss and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle GlassFish. See our IIS vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
