We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The financials are great."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The product has been stable so far."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"The solution is stable."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"S4HANA is very scalable - we use it across seven or eight factories, and everything is running fine."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"The solution can scale well."
"We have access to all types of reports in a single solution."
"SAP S4HANA provides a solution towards a green industry. They keep making a different version of the solution to meet the needs of different industries, such as automotive and utilities."
"The most valuable feature is that HANA loads from memory, which means it loads very quickly."
"The scalability has been good."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"The initial setup could be better. They can make the process a little easier. The functions that we require will be available in the next release. We specifically need a new model, and I think we have some versions to implement. I already read on the SAP website that some functionalities we are waiting for are available in this new version."
"The integration could be made a little simpler in terms of design and implementation."
"Lacking in some customizations."
"Starting out on the solution can be a bit complex and difficult."
"It's an expensive solution"
"An area for improvement would be integration with different kinds of legacies. In the next release, I would like the product to be prepared for blockchain technology and the best way to communicate with social networking."
"The solution is complex technically because both an old and a new path exist."
"If I can highlight one point that could be improved, when we talk about other ERPs, like Oracle, nowadays these ERPs provide free integration with other ERPs. For example, there is an API for banks integrated into every tool and every product form requires that bank integration in order to give real time data into the ERP. But SAP is charging a lot for that particular bank integration scenario and I think it should be free because other ERPs are providing this feature built in to the ERP. People always ask us about the integration and how much it will cost to go with that solution, so people are thinking about this."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 56 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 81 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP Business ByDesign. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.