We performed a comparison between Joomla and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market."
"The speed in which you can take a CMS and make it a full-blown shopping cart with analytics tracking, SEO, user accounts, security, and ease of use through a robust framework of modules and plugins to enhance and promote-related content is about as turnkey as it gets with Joomla."
"The search feature is valuable."
"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"I would like to see the same sorting and attributes available through the web browser on the JED (sorting by free or commercial license, sort by rating, popularity, etc.) within the back-end Joomla Web Installer when browsing extensions."
"I would like to see more back-end admin power pulled into the front-end, therefore the admins will not have to use the back-end as much, especially for the menu manager, user manager, etc. versus using third-party extensions to achieve this."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Make it more intuitive."
"SharePoint designer workflows can be buggy sometimes without any apparent reason."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."
Earn 20 points
Joomla is ranked 16th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 150 reviews. Joomla is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Joomla writes "One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Joomla is most compared with , whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Joomla vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.