We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sophos Virtualization Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."One of Juniper vSRX's most valuable features is its integration with safety applications. It keeps the software secure from developers without relying on third-party solutions."
"The command feature is valuable."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."
"The solution has good features."
"The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors."
"The hardware is stable."
"The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"VPN access is an area that needs improvement."
"Right now, we are going through issues and problems where the product gets dropped with the connection or during the authentication initial phase. While it could be our problem, we would like to see more stability in this area."
"he stability could be improved."
"The solution could improve its technical support."
"The biggest downside of Juniper vSRX is its pricing, which may be too high for smaller organizations. While it's a decent solution, the cost may limit its accessibility to smaller customers."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"It could use more tutorials."
"The user interface could always be better. They could make it simpler and more intuitive."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 33 reviews while Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and OPNsense, whereas Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
