We performed a comparison between Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The log query feature has been the most valuable because it's very good. You can put your data on the cloud and run queues from Sentinel. It will do it all very fast. I love that I don't have to upload it to an Excel file and then manually look for a piece of information. Sentinel is much faster and is good for big databases."
"Sentinel uses Azure Logic Apps for automation, which is really powerful. This allows us to easily automate responses to incidents."
"Sentinel's most important feature is the ability to centralize all the logs in one place. There's no need to search multiple systems for information."
"Native integration with Microsoft security products or other Microsoft software is also crucial. For example, we can integrate Sentinel with Office 365 with one click. Other integrations aren't as easy. Sometimes, we have to do it manually."
"I believe one of the main advantages is Microsoft Sentinel's seamless integration with other Microsoft products."
"One of the most valuable features of Microsoft Sentinel is that it's cloud-based."
"Another area where it is helping us is in creating a single dashboard for our environment. We can collect all the logs into a log analytics workset and run queries on top of it. We get all the results in the dashboard. Even a layman can understand this stuff. The way Microsoft presents it is really incredible."
"We are able to deploy within half an hour and we only require one person to complete the implementation."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."
"My company implemented Wazuh because it was relatively inexpensive. They could quickly get their hands on it to check a box for some audit and compliance."
"It is a stable solution."
"Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Wazuh is the ELK for doing an investigation."
"The following would be a challenge for any product in the market, but we have some in-house apps in our environment... our apps were built with different parameters and the APIs for them are not present in Sentinel. We are working with Microsoft to build those custom APIs that we require. That is currently in progress."
"The product can be improved by reducing the cost to use AI machine learning."
"Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"The solution could be more user-friendly; some query languages are required to operate it."
"Currently, the watchlist feature is being utilized, and although there have been improvements, it is still not fully optimized."
"Microsoft Sentinel is relatively expensive, and its cost should be improved."
"The learning curve could be improved. I am still learning it. We were able to implement the basic features to get them up and running, but there are still so many things that I don't know about all its features. They have a lot of features that we have not been able to use or apply. If they could work on reducing the solution's learning curve, that would be good. While there is a training course held by Microsoft to learn more about this solution, there is a cost associated with it."
"They need to work with other security vendors. For example, we replaced our email gateway with Symantec, but we couldn't collect these logs with Azure Sentinel. Instead of collecting these logs with Azure Sentinel, we are collecting them on Qradar. We couldn't do it with Sentinel, which is a problem for us."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
"The technical support can be improved. Wazuh has some bugs that need to be fixed. It would be good if we can have automation with respect to incidence responses."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"The implementation is very complex."
"It would be great if there could be customization for the decoder portion."
"The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement."
"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."
"The tool doesn't detect anomalies or new environments."
"Adding the flexibility to integrate various plug-ins or modules into its core system would enhance functionality."
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 44th in Log Management with 2 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, IBM Security QRadar, Logpoint, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and Sematext Logs, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
