We performed a comparison between MariaDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would say that for most use cases it works fine."
"The stability of MariaDB is good, it has high availability."
"The most valuable feature of MariaDB is the replication mode."
"I haven't faced any technical issues with the product, and it works fine."
"It is a stable solution."
"There is the need for a robust IDE for MongoDB. The existing PHP admin console doesn't meet the client's requirements effectively."
"The integration with other products is seamless."
"It is a scalable solution. It easily scales up and scales down."
"We can save data very easily."
"We appreciate that the current, redesigned version of this solution that is much more straightforward for new users, and has been well thought out with industry best practice standards in mind."
"Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"The main feature is that the processes are very flexible, they are able to be adapted to the business and their departments."
"It's sufficed all of our requirements. We primarily needed it to run SAP applications, like NetWeaver or S/4HANA, and it has been really good at that."
"The solution is extremely stable. That's the most important aspect of the solution, for our organization. There is no downtime, and the performance is very good."
"The solution offers advanced features that the company was struggling to implement."
"Replication could be better, and it's not so simple. It would be better if they had a replication server. It would make things a lot easier. You need to have that replication server, but not in the same server farm. Then there will be a bit of latency between both because you should have one in one city and another one in a different city. That kind of solution should be more baked into every single database today. Mirroring the database in a live environment where any record written on the production server replicates instantly across the fiber on the other server wasn't easy. Many people don't even bother with that, and they just run one server."
"The license should be cheaper and closer to that offered by MySQL, Oracle and other products."
"I'd like to see improved materialized views, like the ability to save select queries. This feature is missing in MariaDB compared to other relational databases like Oracle and SQL Server."
"Data continuity could be improved."
"It's not very stable. It needs improvement."
"The product needs more features and more functionality. It's imperative that it supports more platforms, and supports more operating systems."
"Master-master replication is something that needs to be simplified."
"MariaDB's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"The solution could improve by having better migration flexibility. For example, it would be helpful if there was a way for customers could check their nonproduction and production deployments."
"HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution."
"When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
"I give the scalability of SAP HANA a six out of ten."
"The SAP HANA interface has room for improvement because it takes more work to manage than the Microsoft SQL Server interface."
MariaDB is ranked 5th in Relational Databases Tools with 53 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. MariaDB is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MariaDB writes "Easy to deploy, cost-effective, and integrates seamlessly with other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". MariaDB is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle Database In-Memory, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and IBM Cloud Pak for Data. See our MariaDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.