We performed a comparison between Meraki Dashboard and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity in navigating through the dashboard. It's well set out, and the layout is nice and user friendly. A lot of clients enjoy seeing layer 7 visibility. They get a good indication and insight into what is happening in their network and what applications are being used the most. They can then customize and give preference to business-critical applications."
"It's really user-friendly."
"Easy to configure with great troubleshooting feature."
"Everything is in a single pane and you can look at your network in one centralized place."
"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."
"There are some whitelist blacklist capabilities in the MX dashboard, which is very helpful."
"We've been spending a lot less time on tickets and deployments, so we have more time to do other things."
"You don't have to be a network engineer to use it."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."
"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"More integration would be an improvement."
"The product is missing a VPN and it is a major issue when it comes to deployment."
"The pricing for this solution needs to be improved."
"There is a bit of a problem when you try to log in and you don't have a fixed IP address. If you're granting access, you need to log in by using the IP address. If your administrator's IP address is not a fixed IP address and it has changed, you might need to update the changed IP address in the interface. For this, you need to log in to the interface to update the IP address. This issue might not have so much to do with Meraki interface."
"I would like to see an alert event feature to monitor what users are downloading and how to block some applications."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"The price could be lower because the license for access points is expensive."
"For my purposes, I don't need to see any other features added to the Meraki Dashboard. I have no criticisms and I do like the tool. If I had a criticism for it, it would be about the pricing because it could be a little less, but again, for the service that you get, I won't complain about that too much."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.