We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."There are many useful features. We use web apps, so instead of starting a web server, we just have machines running some web services. This was helpful for us in terms of the scalability of the application. We also use Active Directory for authentication and some services for the data backup. It is a very good and reliable solution. It was easy to implement this solution. It fits very well into our plans and covers our needs to provide infrastructure in the cloud. The portal to configure new resources is very easy, and it is very easy to allocate new resources."
"There are plenty of functions available that we have used extensively. It is a complete platform of services."
"Azure's Data Lake services are decent. I like AKS, and API Management is relatively straightforward to use. The security and SIEM options Azure offers are good. All the infrastructure services are easy to use and set up."
"Azure is a good networking solution from a WAN perspective."
"Kubernetes service and API management are the most valuable."
"Active Directory is a good feature. The infrastructure features that Azure provides are also good."
"Microsoft Azure has a lot of useful features. They have databases, application services, PaaS solutions, such as platform and infrastructure services. The virtual machines' functions and services are good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are ease of use and the enhancements are continually being updated."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"I would like to see better integration with other products."
"The solution could improve by providing a better user interface and more organized workflows."
"Use of the solution could be easier."
"Microsoft Azure is not always a user-friendly solution. There are too many people who develop this solution. For the end-users, sometimes it's not really fun to use or simple to use. It could be improved."
"With a Synapse environment, we might need to switch to Databricks for better scalability."
"One area for enhancement could be in the realm of big data and unstructured data storage."
"We have faced some challenges trying to deploy a new ESP application."
"I would recommend some enhancement regarding integration features."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"I would like to improve the cost."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"The solution has a very large resource system. It's too big. There are too many items."
"In my experience, the monitoring could be improved."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"The solution is considered expensive."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.