We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can remote control or RDP. That has been the most valuable because we can go into one console and can get to anything we want. Instead of going to all these different consoles, we centralized everything."
"What's valuable is the basic management of the systems, being able to control who can access the systems."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's user-friendly."
"One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined process has significantly improved our software distribution workflows."
"The technical support is good."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"What I like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager are its features, particularly the active session history. It provides insights into SQL, and I use it regularly to identify potential issues."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"It's user friendly."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"Initial setup was complex. There's a lot that goes into it."
"SCCM can improve on third-party application support."
"Troubleshooting in general needs improvement. There's just a ton of logs to go through, and so finding the error log that corresponds with that you're doing can sometimes be difficult."
"We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"The product needs to improve scalability."
"The availability of technical support could improve."
"In my experience, the monitoring could be improved."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The fact that Oracle Enterprise Manager is an expensive solution is a matter of concern and needs to be considered for improvement."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"Technical support could be faster."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and PRTG Network Monitor. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.