We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Microsoft Entra Verified ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft and others in Microsoft Security Suite."https://www.itcentralstation.com/product_reviews/microsoft-bi-review-52460-by-amanda-zhou"
"The visibility and control for permission management are excellent."
"One of the most important is the Conditional Access. It helps affect a Zero Trust strategy positively."
"The performance is good."
"Single sign-on provides flexibility and helps because users don't want to remember so many passwords when logging in. It's a major feature. Once you log in, you have access to all the applications. It also enables us to provide backend access controls to our users, especially when it comes to groups, as we are trying to normalize things."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its authentication security. That is Azure Active Directory's purpose - making cloud services' security and integration easier."
"Microsoft Authenticator is highly secure."
"When logging on to Azure AD it's pretty quick."
"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"The only issue with Azure AD is that it doesn't have control over the wifi network. You have to do something more to have a secure wifi network. To have it working, you need an active directory server on-premises to take care of the networks."
"Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click."
"Transitioning to the cloud is very difficult. They need the training to make it easier."
"Microsoft Entra ID should improve workload identities. It should set conditional access."
"I hope, in the roadmap, Microsoft eventually offers the same features as Okta. It will take some more time to mature."
"The custom role creation function could be improved as it's somewhat tricky to use."
"The main issue is that because Active Directory is in the cloud, it will inevitably be dependent on internet connectivity."
"When it comes to Azure, creating certain things or getting different resources isn't very clear. You need a certain level of knowledge of the system. It could be a little bit more friendly so that some of the things can be done easily, but after everything is created, it's easy to use."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 4th in Microsoft Security Suite with 190 reviews while Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 24th in Microsoft Security Suite with 1 review. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Okta Customer Identity, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview Data Governance.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.
We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.