We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."It is easy to use."
"I find the integration with other tools very easy."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the ease of connections, aggregation, and queries."
"We decided to work with MongoDB as its interface is easier to understand and more universal."
"The solution's most important aspect is its seamless database."
"MongoDB is cool. There is a difference between relational databases and newer databases like MongoDB. MongoDB is scalable and fast."
"The solution does not hold data in tabular format like SQL does but rather clusters data so that it can link on a large scale."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial."
"The product's data consistency could be more efficient than traditional SQLs."
"The stability could be improved."
"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"The improvements could be made to intelligence to detect disk storage and prevent MongoDB from crashing."
"MongoDB should incorporate more features, particularly search functionality, and real-time communication capabilities, to improve the database and provide data listening services. Currently, we rely on the Atlas offering, but it would be fantastic if MongoDB could develop a new solution or updated version that includes these features within its internal database and driver. However, I am uncertain if this would be a viable or profitable move for them, and I am speaking from a mobile-centric viewpoint."
"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Red Hat Data Grid, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with Cassandra, SingleStore, ScyllaDB, Accumulo and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
