We performed a comparison between N-able Take Control and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"TeamViewer has a good interface."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ease of connecting to remote computers. I do not need a lot of information about their computers to connect, a nontechnical person can give me the information needed for me to connect. Additionally, the solution does not gather other system information about the host or client's systems as other solutions might, such as AnyDesk."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the high performance and it is not complicated to use, neither for me nor for the one I'm helping."
"The pilot feature is what stands out the most. I love the ability to use the pilot feature for remote inspections. The augmented portion of the software comes in handy when I have to assist my inspectors. They use the app in the field, and they show me what they're seeing through their phones."
"The dashboards they have are good."
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness."
"It is a scalable product."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"If were to I put myself in the seat of a small business owner, I would prefer TeamViewer to be more of a pay-once-and-own-it solution, rather than paying via a subscription model (although I am using the free version). Only annual subscriptions are available. It makes paying for it the first time seem a little daunting."
"It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"The support could improve their speed."
"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."
"TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money."
"One thing I have noticed is that TeamViewer does not work so well when the machine you are trying to connect to remotely is not running the same version as your machine."
"We have a consultant that helps us do the virtual aspects of TeamViewer."
N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. N-able Take Control is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". N-able Take Control is most compared with Dameware Remote Support, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and Check Point Remote Access VPN, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and LogMeIn Rescue. See our N-able Take Control vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.